Former ECW World Heavyweight Champion, Shane Douglas, recently shared his thoughts on Paul Heyman’s role as a booker for the now-defunct Extreme Championship Wrestling (ECW). Douglas expressed his belief that Heyman was too ‘lax’ in his approach to booking the shows. This perspective came to light during a recent episode of his podcast, “Franchise University.”
Douglas, who has extensive experience in the wrestling scene and is well-versed with the inner workings of the industry, argued that Heyman had a significant amount of power over the wrestlers and the overall direction of the shows. In his view, Heyman could have utilized this power more effectively to maintain higher standards and control within the promotion.
“The first time Sabu broke…” Douglas began, indicating that there were instances where Heyman could have stepped in to enforce more discipline or restraint among the wrestlers, potentially preventing injuries or mishaps.
Douglas’ comments offer an interesting insight into the functioning of ECW during its heyday. The promotion was known for its hardcore style and edgy content, pushing boundaries and often courting controversy. This lax approach, as Douglas suggests, could arguably have been part of what made ECW stand out in the crowded professional wrestling landscape at the time.
However, from Douglas’ perspective, it seems that there was room for more structure and oversight in ECW’s operations. His comments suggest that Heyman’s laissez-faire approach may have been a double-edged sword, contributing to the promotion’s unique appeal but also potentially leading to issues behind the scenes.
While Heyman’s approach to booking may not have been perfect according to Douglas, it’s undeniable that ECW left a lasting impact on the world of professional wrestling. Its influence can still be seen today, in the continued popularity of hardcore wrestling and the many former ECW talents who have gone on to achieve success in other promotions.
Indeed, despite any criticisms, the legacy of ECW – and Paul Heyman’s role within it – remains significant. While it’s interesting to consider how things might have been different under stricter management, it’s clear that ECW’s unique approach was key to its identity.
In the end, wrestling is an industry of personalities, and both Shane Douglas and Paul Heyman are larger-than-life characters who brought their own distinct styles to the business. Their differing viewpoints on how ECW was run reflect the diversity of opinions within the wrestling world – a diversity that continues to make the industry such a fascinating spectacle. 🤼♂️
It’s essential to remember, though, that these are just one man’s views. There are likely many others within the wrestling community who have their own perspectives on Heyman’s booking style and the operation of ECW during its peak. However, it’s always enlightening to hear from those who were there, providing a firsthand account of what it was like behind the scenes.
Douglas’ insights serve as a reminder that the world of professional wrestling is as much about the backstage politics and decision-making as it is about the action in the ring. It’s a complex and ever-evolving industry, where each decision can have far-reaching effects. And while we may never know the full extent of what went on behind the scenes at ECW, insights like these help to paint a fuller picture of this iconic period in wrestling history.